• Home
  • Projects
  • Insights
  • Our Team
  • Specialisms
  • Contact
Menu

March Consultants Ltd | Building Services Consultants | MEP Engineers | Sustainability & Energy Specialists

Carr's Lane
Isle of Man, , IM4 4QB
01624 616300
Building services consultants providing cost and environmentally conscious MEP design and energy saving solutions

Your Custom Text Here

March Consultants Ltd | Building Services Consultants | MEP Engineers | Sustainability & Energy Specialists

  • Home
  • Projects
  • Insights
  • Our Team
  • Specialisms
  • Contact

Finding the Sustainable Sweet Spot for Battery Storage

July 23, 2025 STEPHEN KELLY

The point where adding more battery capacity stops adding value. Our latest case study explains how.

We were recently asked to review a proposed solar PV and battery storage system for a large residential property with significant electrical demand. The proposal consisted of 60 panels (405 W each) and a 50 kWh battery. On paper, the system looked reasonable — but our assessment found scope for optimisation both technically and financially.

Step One: Understanding the Load

We modelled three usage scenarios — Low (37,000 kWh), Medium (42,000 kWh), and High (50,000+ kWh) — to reflect possible variations in how the building might operate over time. This formed the basis for sizing the system and understanding self-consumption potential.

Simulation Method

All options were modelled using software that dynamically simulates site-specific solar generation and load interaction at sub-hourly intervals, using historic weather data for the Isle of Man. This allows us to assess how the system behaves on a realistic daily and seasonal cycle — capturing the impact of variable solar irradiance, consumption peaks, and battery charge/discharge cycles with a high degree of resolution.

This approach provides much more reliable output than basic spreadsheet methods or tools that rely on monthly averages.

Key Refinements

  • The use of higher-output 445 W panels allowed the system to increase from 24.3 kWp to 26.7 kWp within the same footprint.

  • Battery capacities between 20 kWh and 40 kWh were modelled to identify the most effective configuration in terms of return on investment.

  • A particular concern was the 5-year battery warranty in the original proposal, which raises questions about long-term performance and replacement risk in the context of a 25-year system lifespan.

📊 Self-Consumption vs Battery Size

Self-consumption increases with battery capacity, as expected. However, beyond a certain point, the additional capital cost outweighs the marginal benefit.

📊 Financial Summary (Medium Usage Scenario – 42,419 kWh/year)

The ~20 kWh option provides the best overall outcome — delivering the highest net profit with a strong payback period and a good balance between performance, warranty life, and cost.

🌱 CO₂ Offset Over 25 Years

While larger batteries deliver more operational carbon savings, the data reveals a clear point of diminishing returns. The initial jump from a PV-only system to one with a ~20 kWh battery provides the most significant impact, boosting the annual CO₂ offset by nearly 70%.

Beyond this, the gains become less pronounced. This is critical because every battery has an upfront embodied carbon cost from manufacturing (not shown). For each step up in size, the smaller operational savings must justify a larger carbon footprint. In this analysis, the ~20 kWh system hits the sweet spot, delivering the most effective carbon reduction when weighed against its environmental cost.

Final Thoughts

This analysis shows that the biggest system is rarely the most effective. While the original proposal was broadly suitable, our modelling identified the true sustainable sweet spot: a configuration that delivers a stronger long-term outcome by properly balancing financial returns with environmental benefits. A modest number of changes led to a significantly improved result.

If you have received a proposal for a solar PV system and would like a second opinion focused on lifetime value, I invite you to get in touch via direct message.

Solar PV & Battery Storage Facts:


Fact 1: The levelised cost of utility-scale solar PV has fallen over 85% in the last decade, making it the cheapest source of new-build electricity in history.

Fact 2: The solar energy striking the Earth's surface in 90 minutes is sufficient to meet total global energy demand for an entire year.

Fact 3: Lithium-ion battery prices have declined by approximately 90% since 2010, unlocking the economic viability of grid-scale energy storage.

Fact 4: Battery storage is now displacing traditional gas peaker plants for grid balancing services, offering response times in milliseconds versus minutes.

Fact 5: Global solar deployment continues to accelerate at an exponential rate. The amount of new solar capacity the world is expected to install in 2025 alone will be greater than the entire planet's total installed capacity from just a decade ago, in 2015.

In Case Studies Tags solar, pv, battery, LCC, energy, modelling, feasibility, analysis
The Buchan School: A Practical Case for the Circular Economy →

Design House, Unit 18, Carrs Lane, Douglas, Isle of Man, IM4 4QB

T: +44 (0)1624 616300
E: info@mcliom.com

Copyright © 2025 march consultants limited. all rights reserved.